↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of gait perturbation paradigms for improving reactive stepping responses and falls risk among healthy older adults

Overview of attention for article published in European Review of Aging and Physical Activity, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 174)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
327 Mendeley
Title
A systematic review of gait perturbation paradigms for improving reactive stepping responses and falls risk among healthy older adults
Published in
European Review of Aging and Physical Activity, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s11556-017-0173-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher McCrum, Marissa H. G. Gerards, Kiros Karamanidis, Wiebren Zijlstra, Kenneth Meijer

Abstract

Falls are a leading cause of injury among older adults and most often occur during walking. While strength and balance training moderately improve falls risk, training reactive recovery responses following sudden perturbations during walking may be more task-specific for falls prevention. The aim of this review was to determine the variety, characteristics and effectiveness of gait perturbation paradigms that have been used for improving reactive recovery responses during walking and reducing falls among healthy older adults. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE and CINAHL databases in December 2015, repeated in May 2016, using sets of terms relating to gait, perturbations, adaptation and training, and ageing. Inclusion criteria: studies were conducted with healthy participants of 60 years or older; repeated, unpredictable, mechanical perturbations were applied during walking; and reactive recovery responses to gait perturbations or the incidence of laboratory or daily life falls were recorded. Results were narratively synthesised. The risk of bias for each study (PEDro Scale) and the levels of evidence for each perturbation type were determined. In the nine studies that met the inclusion criteria, moveable floor platforms, ground surface compliance changes, or treadmill belt accelerations or decelerations were used to perturb the gait of older adults. Eight studies used a single session of perturbations, with two studies using multiple sessions. Eight of the studies reported improvement in the reactive recovery response to the perturbations. Four studies reported a reduction in the percentage of laboratory falls from the pre- to post-perturbation experience measurement and two studies reported a reduction in daily life falls. As well as the range of perturbation types, the magnitude and frequency of the perturbations varied between the studies. To date, a range of perturbation paradigms have been used successfully to perturb older adults' gait and stimulate reactive response adaptations. Variation also exists in the number and magnitudes of applied perturbations. Future research should examine the effects of perturbation type, magnitude and number on the extent and retention of the reactive recovery response adaptations, as well as on falls, over longer time periods among older adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 323 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 19%
Student > Master 53 16%
Researcher 32 10%
Student > Bachelor 29 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 55 17%
Unknown 78 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 56 17%
Sports and Recreations 45 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 10%
Neuroscience 22 7%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 108 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,877,424
of 24,880,704 outputs
Outputs from European Review of Aging and Physical Activity
#22
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,910
of 316,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Review of Aging and Physical Activity
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,880,704 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.