| Title |
Surgical treatment of early-stage thymomas: robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus transsternal thymectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-013-3137-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bo Ye, Wang Li, Xiao-Xiao Ge, Jian Feng, Chun-Yu Ji, Ming Cheng, Ji-Cheng Tantai, Heng Zhao |
| Abstract |
This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes for patients who underwent transsternal or robot-assisted thymectomy and to determine the feasibility of robot-assisted thymectomy for the treatment of Masaoka stages 1 and 2 thymomas. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 17% |
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 71% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2013.
All research outputs
#13,692,579
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#2,991
of 6,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,504
of 198,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#28
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,008 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.