↓ Skip to main content

Social justice and mobility in coastal Louisiana, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Regional Environmental Change, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 1,370)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Social justice and mobility in coastal Louisiana, USA
Published in
Regional Environmental Change, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10113-017-1115-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Craig E. Colten, Jessica R. Z. Simms, Audrey A. Grismore, Scott A. Hemmerling

Abstract

Louisiana faces extensive coastal land loss which threatens the livelihoods of marginalized populations. These groups have endured extreme disruptive events in the past and have survived in the region by relying on several resilient practices, including mobility. Facing environmental changes that will be wrought by deliberate coastal restoration programs, elderly residents are resisting migration while younger residents continue a decades-long inland migration. Interviews and historical records illustrate a complex intersection of resilient practices and environmental migration. The process underway conflicts to some extent with prevailing concepts in environmental migration most notably deviating from established migration patterns. In terms of social justice, selective out-migration of younger adults leaves a more vulnerable population behind, but also provides a supplementary source of income and social links to inland locales. Organized resistance to restoration projects represents a social justice response to programs that threaten the resource-based livelihoods of coastal residents while offering protection to safer inland urban residents.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 17%
Student > Master 14 15%
Researcher 11 12%
Professor 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 27 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 18%
Social Sciences 13 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 9%
Engineering 6 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 34 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2021.
All research outputs
#697,774
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Regional Environmental Change
#36
of 1,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,227
of 310,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Environmental Change
#3
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.