You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Covered versus uncovered self-expandable nitinol stents in the palliative treatment of malignant distal biliary obstruction: results from a randomized, multicenter study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.gie.2010.07.036 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric Kullman, Farshad Frozanpor, Claes Söderlund, Stefan Linder, Per Sandström, Anna Lindhoff-Larsson, Ervin Toth, Gert Lindell, Eduard Jonas, Jacob Freedman, Martin Ljungman, Claes Rudberg, Bo Ohlin, Rebecka Zacharias, Carl-Eric Leijonmarck, Kalev Teder, Anders Ringman, Gunnar Persson, Mehmet Gözen, Olle Eriksson |
| Abstract |
Covered biliary metal stents have been developed to prevent tumor ingrowth. Previous comparative studies are limited and often include few patients. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 28% |
| Unknown | 18 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#4,836,164
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
#1,246
of 5,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,964
of 109,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
#5
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.