↓ Skip to main content

Cold stress changes the concanavalin A-positive glycosylation pattern of proteins expressed in the basal parts of rice leaf sheaths

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Cold stress changes the concanavalin A-positive glycosylation pattern of proteins expressed in the basal parts of rice leaf sheaths
Published in
Amino Acids, February 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00726-008-0039-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Komatsu, E. Yamada, K. Furukawa

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Professor 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 26%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Philosophy 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,522,616
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#498
of 1,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,608
of 79,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.