| Title |
Health effects due to endotoxin inhalation (review)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Toxicology, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00204-008-0290-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
V. Liebers, M. Raulf-Heimsoth, T. Brüning |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 130 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 17% |
| Researcher | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 21 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 10% |
| Engineering | 11 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 18% |
| Unknown | 38 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,301,555
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#251
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,898
of 80,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them