You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of a Web 2.0 Portal to Improve Education and Communication in Young Patients With Families: Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Internet Research, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2196/jmir.2425 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lena Hanberger, Johnny Ludvigsson, Sam Nordfeldt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 29% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Hungary | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 241 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 14% |
| Researcher | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 21% |
| Unknown | 69 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 16% |
| Psychology | 26 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Unknown | 83 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2014.
All research outputs
#2,317,005
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#1,937
of 7,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,485
of 215,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#32
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.