↓ Skip to main content

A flowcytometric analysis to efficiently quantify multiple innate immune cells and T Cell subsets in human blood

Overview of attention for article published in Cytometry Part A, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A flowcytometric analysis to efficiently quantify multiple innate immune cells and T Cell subsets in human blood
Published in
Cytometry Part A, March 2017
DOI 10.1002/cyto.a.23080
Pubmed ID
Authors

D.F. Draxler, M.T. Madondo, G. Hanafi, M. Plebanski, R.L. Medcalf

Abstract

The balance of inflammation and immunosuppression driven by changed ratios in diverse myeloid and T cell subsets, as well as their state of activation and ability to migrate to lymphoid compartments or inflammatory sites, has emerged as a highly active area of study across clinical trials of vaccines and therapies against cancer, trauma, as well as autoimmune and infectious diseases. There is a need for effective protocols which maximally use the possibilities offered by modern flow cytometers to characterize such immune cell changes in peripheral blood using small volumes of human blood. Additionally, longitudinal clinical studies often use cryopreserved samples, which can impact flow cytometric results. To efficiently gauge both the innate and the adaptive immune response, two novel 15-color antibody panels to identify key myeloid and T cell subsets and their functional potential were established. This approach was used to compare cellular immune profiles in fresh whole blood and in matched cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Cocktail I was designed to identify and characterize myeloid cell populations including dendritic cells (DCs), monocytic monocyte-derived suppressor cells (MO-MDSC), and monocytes, determining further core aspects of their state of maturity, T cell stimulatory (or inhibitory) potential, and migration capability. Cocktail II was used for phenotyping diverse T cells subsets, and their key migration and functional regulatory capabilities. The two 15-color antibody panels for the evaluation of both immune-stimulating and immunosuppressive processes presented herein allowed for efficient evaluation of the balance of immune activation versus immunosuppression across key blood cells, with good resolution for all 15 markers stained for in each panel. Gating strategies for the myeloid and T cells are presented to further support specific subset identification. This protocol was shown to be reproducible across donors and useful to study both RBC-lysed whole blood and cryopreserved PBMCs. © 2017 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 27 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 28 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,186,871
of 24,578,676 outputs
Outputs from Cytometry Part A
#412
of 1,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,506
of 315,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cytometry Part A
#10
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,578,676 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,391 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.