You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exercise training in heart failure: from theory to practice. A consensus document of the Heart Failure Association and the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Heart Failure, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Massimo F. Piepoli, Viviane Conraads, Ugo Corrà, Kenneth Dickstein, Darrel P. Francis, Tiny Jaarsma, John McMurray, Burkert Pieske, Ewa Piotrowicz, Jean‐Paul Schmid, Stefan D. Anker, Alain Cohen Solal, Gerasimos S. Filippatos, Arno W. Hoes, Stefan Gielen, Pantaleo Giannuzzi, Piotr P. Ponikowski |
| Abstract |
The European Society of Cardiology heart failure guidelines firmly recommend regular physical activity and structured exercise training (ET), but this recommendation is still poorly implemented in daily clinical practice outside specialized centres and in the real world of heart failure clinics. In reality, exercise intolerance can be successfully tackled by applying ET. We need to encourage the mindset that breathlessness may be evidence of signalling between the periphery and central haemodynamic performance and regular physical activity may ultimately bring about favourable changes in myocardial function, symptoms, functional capacity, and increased hospitalization-free life span and probably survival. In this position paper, we provide practical advice for the application of exercise in heart failure and how to overcome traditional barriers, based on the current scientific and clinical knowledge supporting the beneficial effect of this intervention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 21% |
| Canada | 2 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 615 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 604 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 90 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 87 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 12% |
| Researcher | 57 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 48 | 8% |
| Other | 138 | 22% |
| Unknown | 123 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 217 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 86 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 70 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 57 | 9% |
| Unknown | 147 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,373,583
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Heart Failure
#584
of 2,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,536
of 238,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Heart Failure
#15
of 361 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 361 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.