| Title |
Passive water control at the surface of a superhydrophobic lichen
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Planta, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00425-011-1475-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher A. E. Hamlett, Neil James Shirtcliffe, F. Brian Pyatt, Michael I. Newton, Glen McHale, Kerstin Koch |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 24% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2017.
All research outputs
#20,408,464
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#2,387
of 2,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,409
of 119,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,730 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.