↓ Skip to main content

The Collective Origins of Valued Originality

Overview of attention for article published in Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
7 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Collective Origins of Valued Originality
Published in
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 2013
DOI 10.1177/1088868313498001
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Alexander Haslam, Inmaculada Adarves-Yorno, Tom Postmes, Lise Jans

Abstract

Prevailing approaches to individual and group creativity have focused on personal factors that contribute to creative behavior (e.g., personality, intelligence, motivation), and the processes of behaving creatively and appreciating creativity are understood to be largely unrelated. This article uses social identity and self-categorization theories as the basis for a model of creativity that addresses these lacunae by emphasizing the role that groups play in stimulating and shaping creative acts and in determining the reception they are given. We argue that shared social identity (or lack of it) motivates individuals to rise to particular creative challenges and provides a basis for certain forms of creativity to be recognized (or disregarded). Empirical work informed by this approach supports eight novel hypotheses relating to individual, group, and systemic dimensions of the creativity process. These also provide an agenda for future creativity research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 177 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 22%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 8%
Other 44 24%
Unknown 33 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 60 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 40 22%
Social Sciences 21 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Arts and Humanities 5 3%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 41 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#600,991
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from Personality and Social Psychology Review
#86
of 405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,013
of 198,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Personality and Social Psychology Review
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.