↓ Skip to main content

Tube-Jack Testing for Irregular Masonry Walls: Regular Masonry Wall Testing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Tube-Jack Testing for Irregular Masonry Walls: Regular Masonry Wall Testing
Published in
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10921-016-0360-x
Authors

Elizabeth Manning, Luís F. Ramos, Francisco M. Fernandes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Professor 3 23%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 62%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2017.
All research outputs
#18,536,772
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation
#144
of 242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,513
of 354,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 242 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.