↓ Skip to main content

Update from the 4th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumours: Odontogenic and Maxillofacial Bone Tumors

Overview of attention for article published in Head and Neck Pathology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
466 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
522 Mendeley
Title
Update from the 4th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumours: Odontogenic and Maxillofacial Bone Tumors
Published in
Head and Neck Pathology, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12105-017-0794-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

John M. Wright, Marilena Vered

Abstract

The 4th edition of the World Health Organization's Classification of Head and Neck Tumours was published in January of 2017. This article provides a summary of the changes to Chapter 4 Tumours of the oral cavity and mobile tongue and Chapter 8 Odontogenic and maxillofacial bone tumours. Odontogenic cysts which were eliminated from the 3rd 2005 edition were included in the 4th edition as well as other unique allied conditons of the jaws. Many new tumors published since 2005 have been included in the 2017 classification.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 522 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 522 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 73 14%
Student > Bachelor 62 12%
Student > Master 56 11%
Other 27 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 5%
Other 100 19%
Unknown 178 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 268 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 1%
Social Sciences 4 <1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 <1%
Other 19 4%
Unknown 204 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,100,041
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Head and Neck Pathology
#336
of 1,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,443
of 328,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head and Neck Pathology
#12
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.