↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mismatch Repair-Deficient Crypt Foci in Lynch Syndrome – Molecular Alterations and Association with Clinical Parameters
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0121980
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 72 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 20 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2017.
All research outputs
#3,515,553
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#46,126
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,098
of 279,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,032
of 6,434 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,434 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.