↓ Skip to main content

Investigating the spatiotemporal characteristics of the deoxyhemoglobin-related and deoxyhemoglobin-unrelated functional hemodynamic response across cortical layers in awake marmosets

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroImage, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Investigating the spatiotemporal characteristics of the deoxyhemoglobin-related and deoxyhemoglobin-unrelated functional hemodynamic response across cortical layers in awake marmosets
Published in
NeuroImage, March 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cecil Chern-Chyi Yen, Daniel Papoti, Afonso C. Silva

Abstract

Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has become a major tool to map neural activity. However, the spatiotemporal characteristics of the BOLD functional hemodynamic response across the cortical layers remain poorly understood. While human fMRI studies suffer from low spatiotemporal resolution, the use of anesthesia in animal models introduces confounding factors. Additionally, inflow contributions to the fMRI signal become non-negligible when short repetition times (TRs) are used. In the present work, we mapped the BOLD fMRI response to somatosensory stimulation in awake marmosets. To address the above technical concerns, we used a dual-echo gradient-recalled echo planar imaging (GR-EPI) sequence to separate the deoxyhemoglobin-related response (absolute T2⁎ differences) from the deoxyhemoglobin-unrelated response (relative S0 changes). We employed a spatial saturation pulse to saturate incoming arterial spins and reduce inflow effects. Functional GR-EPI images were obtained from a single coronal slice with two different echo times (13.5 and 40.5 ms) and TR = 0.2s. BOLD, T2⁎, and S0 images were calculated and their functional responses were detected in both hemispheres of primary somatosensory cortex, from which five laminar regions (L1+2, L3, L4, L5, and L6) were derived. The spatiotemporal distribution of the BOLD response across the cortical layers was heterogeneous, with the middle layers having the highest BOLD amplitudes and shortest onset times. ΔT2⁎ also showed a similar trend. However, functional S0 changes were detected only in L1+2, with a fast onset time. Because inflow effects were minimized, the source of S0 functional changes in L1+2 could be attributed to a reduction of cerebrospinal fluid volume fraction due to the functional increase in cerebral blood volume and to unmodeled T2⁎ changes in the extra- and intra-venous compartments. Caution should be exercised when interpreting laminar BOLD fMRI changes in superficial layers as surrogates of underlying neural activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 28%
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Master 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 15 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 25 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Engineering 5 7%
Physics and Astronomy 5 7%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 20 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2017.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#9,712
of 12,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,891
of 324,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#199
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.