↓ Skip to main content

Using balance training to improve the performance of youth basketball players

Overview of attention for article published in Sport Sciences for Health, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 296)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
Title
Using balance training to improve the performance of youth basketball players
Published in
Sport Sciences for Health, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11332-013-0143-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriele Boccolini, Alessandro Brazzit, Luca Bonfanti, Giampietro Alberti

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 12 weeks of balance training to improve the balance and vertical jump abilities of young basketball players. Twenty-three players from two teams in the Under Fifteen Basketball Excellence category participated in the study. Participants were divided into two training groups: balance training (BAL, n = 11) and isotonic training (ISO, n = 12). Both groups were tested for balance and vertical jumps at the beginning of the competitive season and at the end of 12 weeks of specific training programme. All of the tests were performed in sustained bipodalic and monopodalic (both right and left) positions. The results showed that players who participated in balance training for 12 weeks, compared to players who trained with isotonic machines, exhibited a significantly increase in balance (bipodalic 28.3 %; right 41.4 %; left 45.8 %; p < 0.01) and muscular power (bipodalic 8.1 %; right 13.5 %; left 12.5 %; p < 0.01) as measured through a vertical jump. In conclusion, balance training using unstable boards was an effective training method for improving balance and the vertical jump, which is a basketball-specific action that frequently occurs in this sport.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 199 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Other 12 6%
Researcher 12 6%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 78 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 65 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 85 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,676,729
of 23,668,780 outputs
Outputs from Sport Sciences for Health
#17
of 296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,027
of 193,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sport Sciences for Health
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,668,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them