Title |
Impact of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy on Blood Pressure in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hypopnea: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Lung, March 2007
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00408-006-0117-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
M. Alajmi, A. T. Mulgrew, J. Fox, W. Davidson, M. Schulzer, E. Mak, C. F. Ryan, J. Fleetham, P. Choi, N. T. Ayas |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 77 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
Researcher | 11 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Other | 16 | 20% |
Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 57% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 21 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2012.
All research outputs
#2,700,940
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Lung
#63
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,145
of 77,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them