↓ Skip to main content

Discussion: moving food regimes forward: reflections on symposium essays

Overview of attention for article published in Agriculture and Human Values, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Discussion: moving food regimes forward: reflections on symposium essays
Published in
Agriculture and Human Values, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10460-009-9225-6
Authors

Harriet Friedmann

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 126 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 25%
Student > Master 27 21%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 66 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 15%
Environmental Science 10 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 18 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,866,480
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Agriculture and Human Values
#431
of 804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,767
of 113,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agriculture and Human Values
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.