| Title |
Non-Pharmacologic Interventions for Older Adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Preliminary Recommendations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuropsychology Review, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11065-017-9342-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Colette M. Smart, Justin E. Karr, Corson N. Areshenkoff, Laura A. Rabin, Carol Hudon, Nicola Gates, Jordan I. Ali, Eider M. Arenaza-Urquijo, Rachel F. Buckley, Gael Chetelat, Harald Hampel, Frank Jessen, Natalie L. Marchant, Sietske A. M. Sikkes, Andrea Tales, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Linda Wesselman, and the Subjective Cognitive Decline Initiative (SCD-I) Working Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Chile | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 237 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 13% |
| Researcher | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 22% |
| Unknown | 61 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 44 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 24 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 75 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,867,221
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychology Review
#103
of 496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,245
of 322,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychology Review
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.