↓ Skip to main content

Wahrnehmung von Hörproblemen bei älteren Menschen

Overview of attention for article published in HNO, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Wahrnehmung von Hörproblemen bei älteren Menschen
Published in
HNO, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00106-017-0334-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Moser, W. Luxenberger, W. Freidl

Abstract

Age-related hearing loss is one of the most common chronic sensory impairments in the older population. This chronic condition is associated with bio-psychosocial consequences such as cognitive decline, depression, withdrawal, isolation, and reduced wellbeing. This study aimed to investigate the perception of hearing problems among older women and men (≥55 years) with age-related hearing loss. Furthermore, the association between functional hearing loss and perceived hearing problems was examined. Lastly, this study undertook a detailed investigation of subjective experiences in order to better understand the consequences of age-related hearing loss for daily life. With the aid of mixed methods, quantitative data were gathered from 65 participants with age-related hearing impairment in Austria using the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE). Moreover, qualitative data regarding experiences with hearing problems were collected by performing semi-structured problem-centered interviews and analyzing the results of a further 14 older adults with hearing loss. On average, participants assessed their hearing handicap as mild and perceived consequences on emotional, social, and communication levels. Moreover, feelings of insecurity were evident. In addition, the findings indicate a relationship but also a discrepancy between hearing loss and hearing handicap, i. e., not all participants perceived a hearing handicap. Patient-centered care encompassing (1) objective and self-report measures for assessing hearing problems, (2) involvement of family members and significant others, (3) counseling and exchange of information, and (4) a shared decision-making approach could enhance quality of life and quality of care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 26%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Professor 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2017.
All research outputs
#20,408,464
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from HNO
#324
of 431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,339
of 307,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HNO
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.