↓ Skip to main content

Alpha, beta: The rhythm of the attentional blink

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Alpha, beta: The rhythm of the attentional blink
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, March 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13423-017-1257-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimron L. Shapiro, Simon Hanslmayr, James T. Enns, Alejandro Lleras

Abstract

Extant theories of the attentional blink propose that the most critical factor in determining second target accuracy is the time that elapses between the first and second targets. We report that this conclusion has overlooked an equally important determinant, namely, the frequency of the entraining stream in which these targets are embedded. Specifically, we show in two experiments that the signature of the attentional blink-second target accuracy that increases with intertarget lag-is significantly larger for entraining streams that are in the alpha-beta frequency range, relative to streams that are slower (theta) or faster (gamma). This finding ties the attentional blink critically, for the first time, to these two prominent oscillation frequencies that are known to be involved in the control of human attention and consciousness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 23%
Researcher 22 20%
Student > Master 21 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Professor 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 48 43%
Neuroscience 26 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 21 19%