↓ Skip to main content

Addiction, cigarette smoking, and voluntary control of action: Do cigarette smokers lose their free will?

Overview of attention for article published in Addictive Behaviors Reports , January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 379)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Addiction, cigarette smoking, and voluntary control of action: Do cigarette smokers lose their free will?
Published in
Addictive Behaviors Reports , January 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.abrep.2017.01.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roy F. Baumeister

Abstract

Opinions differ widely as to whether addicts lose the ability to control their behavior and employ free will. This article reviews empirical findings regarding multiple questions relevant to the issue of free will among addicted smokers: Is smoking voluntary behavior? Can people quit smoking? Why don't people quit smoking? Why do smokers relapse when they try to quit? Do addicted smokers suffer from irresistible cravings? Are there some people who cannot quit? Are there conditions that make resistance impossible? Why would they smoke knowing it can kill them? The evidence reviewed here seems most consistent with the view that smokers retain control over their actions but cannot easily stop having frequent desires to smoke.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 244 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 49 20%
Student > Master 31 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 8%
Researcher 19 8%
Lecturer 10 4%
Other 39 16%
Unknown 76 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 54 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 44 18%
Unknown 84 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2022.
All research outputs
#573,110
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Addictive Behaviors Reports
#14
of 379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,302
of 423,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addictive Behaviors Reports
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.