↓ Skip to main content

Dietary Management of Infantile Colic: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
Title
Dietary Management of Infantile Colic: A Systematic Review
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10995-011-0842-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marina Iacovou, Robin A. Ralston, Jane Muir, Karen Z. Walker, Helen Truby

Abstract

Infantile colic, the cause of 10-20% of all early paediatrician visits, can lead to parental exhaustion and stress. A systematic review was conducted to examine whether dietary change provides an effective therapy for infantile colic. Six databases were searched from 1960, and 24 studies selected for inclusion. In breastfed infants, evidence suggests that a hypoallergenic maternal diet may be beneficial for reducing symptoms of colic. In formula-fed infants, colic may improve after changing from a standard cow's milk formula to either a hydrolysed protein formula or a soy-based formula. Fibre-supplemented formulae had no effect. Removal of poorly digested carbohydrates from the infant's diet has promise, but additional clinical studies must be conducted before a recommendation can be made. Use of a universal definition to measure symptoms of infantile colic and consistent analysis of urine and faecal samples would improve the evidence in this area.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 193 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 14%
Student > Master 27 14%
Other 19 10%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Other 46 23%
Unknown 45 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 7%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Psychology 7 4%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 47 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,263,009
of 25,882,826 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#208
of 2,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,249
of 129,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#4
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,882,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.