↓ Skip to main content

Jails, prisons, and the health of urban populations: A review of the impact of the correctional system on community health

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Urban Health, June 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
335 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Jails, prisons, and the health of urban populations: A review of the impact of the correctional system on community health
Published in
Journal of Urban Health, June 2001
DOI 10.1093/jurban/78.2.214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas Freudenberg

Abstract

This review examined the interactions between the correctional system and the health of urban populations. Cities have more poor people, more people of color, and higher crime rates than suburban and rural areas; thus, urban populations are overrepresented in the nation's jails and prisons. As a result, US incarceration policies and programs have a disproportionate impact on urban communities, especially black and Latino ones. Health conditions that are overrepresented in incarcerated populations include substance abuse, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other infectious diseases, perpetration and victimization by violence, mental illness, chronic disease, and reproductive health problems. Correctional systems have direct and indirect effects on health. Indirectly, they influence family structure, economic opportunities, political participation, and normative community values on sex, drugs, and violence. Current correctional policies also divert resources from other social needs. Correctional systems can have a direct effect on the health of urban populations by offering health care and health promotion in jails and prisons, by linking inmates to community services after release, and by assisting in the process of community reintegration. Specific recommendations for action and research to reduce the adverse health and social consequences of current incarceration policies are offered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 267 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 13%
Student > Bachelor 36 13%
Researcher 34 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 8%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 57 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 69 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 61 22%
Psychology 24 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 70 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,631,822
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#253
of 1,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,187
of 41,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.