| Title |
A survey of tagging techniques for music, speech and environmental sound
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Artificial Intelligence Review, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10462-012-9362-y |
| Authors |
Shufei Duan, Jinglan Zhang, Paul Roe, Michael Towsey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 32 | 38% |
| Engineering | 14 | 16% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2013.
All research outputs
#18,345,822
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Artificial Intelligence Review
#580
of 665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,120
of 183,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Artificial Intelligence Review
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 665 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.