| Title |
The Heterogeneity of Board-Level Sustainability Committees and Corporate Social Performance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10551-017-3453-2 |
| Authors |
Jenna J. Burke, Rani Hoitash, Udi Hoitash |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 292 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 23 | 8% |
| Researcher | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 13% |
| Unknown | 125 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 111 | 38% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 25 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 127 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2017.
All research outputs
#4,209,783
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#704
of 2,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,665
of 420,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#16
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.