↓ Skip to main content

Gesangsformen und Verwandtschaft der asiatischen ZilpzalpePhylloscopus collybita abietinus undPh. c. sindianus

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ornithology, October 1981
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Gesangsformen und Verwandtschaft der asiatischen ZilpzalpePhylloscopus collybita abietinus undPh. c. sindianus
Published in
Journal of Ornithology, October 1981
DOI 10.1007/bf01652928
Authors

Jochen Martens, Sabine Hänel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#774
of 1,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,892
of 7,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them