↓ Skip to main content

Matching intra-procedural information with coping style reduces psychophysiological arousal in women undergoing colposcopy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Matching intra-procedural information with coping style reduces psychophysiological arousal in women undergoing colposcopy
Published in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10865-012-9435-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanna Kola, Jane C. Walsh, Brian M. Hughes, Siobhán Howard

Abstract

This study assessed the combined effects of coping style and intra-procedural information on indices of distress (physiological measures, observed distress, self-report measures of anxiety and affect) among a group of patients undergoing colposcopy. High and low monitors were exposed to one of three interventions: high information (live video feed of colposcopy); low information (complete audiovisual distraction); and control. Results revealed a 2 (monitoring style) × 3 (information level) × 2 (time) interaction for systolic blood pressure (SBP), F(2, 111) = 3.55, p = .032. Among low monitors, patients in the low-information group exhibited significant SBP reductions during colposcopy, while those in the high-information group exhibited SBP increases. Among high monitors, patients in the high-information and control groups exhibited SBP reductions. Further, significant differences in observed signs of distress were found between groups with high monitors in the low-information group faring best overall, F(2, 111) = 4.41, p = .014. These findings indicate that tailoring information to suit individual coping style may maximize the apparent efficacy of interventions aimed at reducing stress during medical examinations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 76 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Master 9 12%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Lecturer 4 5%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 28 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 29 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,394,617
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#420
of 1,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,090
of 164,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.