| Title |
Prevalence of BRCA Mutations Among Women with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) in a Genetic Counseling Cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-013-3205-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel Greenup, Adam Buchanan, Wendy Lorizio, Keelia Rhoads, Salina Chan, Tracey Leedom, Robin King, Jane McLennan, Beth Crawford, P. Kelly Marcom, E. Shelley Hwang |
| Abstract |
Revised NCCN guidelines recommend that women ≤60 years with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) be referred for consideration of genetic counseling. Small, homogeneous samples have limited evaluation of BRCA mutation prevalence among different ethnicities affected by TNBC subtype. We sought to determine whether the prevalence of BRCA mutations within a TNBC cohort differs by demographic factors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 179 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 48 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 51 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,825,488
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,124
of 6,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,935
of 200,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#8
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.