↓ Skip to main content

Magnesium, vitamin D status and mortality: results from US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001 to 2006 and NHANES III

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
136 X users
facebook
29 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Magnesium, vitamin D status and mortality: results from US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001 to 2006 and NHANES III
Published in
BMC Medicine, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-11-187
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xinqing Deng, Yiqing Song, JoAnn E Manson, Lisa B Signorello, Shumin M Zhang, Martha J Shrubsole, Reid M Ness, Douglas L Seidner, Qi Dai

Abstract

Magnesium plays an essential role in the synthesis and metabolism of vitamin D and magnesium supplementation substantially reversed the resistance to vitamin D treatment in patients with magnesium-dependent vitamin-D-resistant rickets. We hypothesized that dietary magnesium alone, particularly its interaction with vitamin D intake, contributes to serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels, and the associations between serum 25(OH)D and risk of mortality may be modified by magnesium intake level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 136 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 206 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 18%
Student > Master 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Other 22 10%
Student > Postgraduate 17 8%
Other 51 24%
Unknown 33 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 7%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 40 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 144. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2023.
All research outputs
#293,401
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#246
of 4,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,078
of 213,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#8
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.