↓ Skip to main content

Using Effort-Reward Imbalance Theory to Understand High Rates of Depression and Anxiety Among Clergy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Prevention, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Using Effort-Reward Imbalance Theory to Understand High Rates of Depression and Anxiety Among Clergy
Published in
Journal of Prevention, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10935-013-0321-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rae Jean Proeschold-Bell, Andrew Miles, Matthew Toth, Christopher Adams, Bruce W. Smith, David Toole

Abstract

The clergy occupation is unique in its combination of role strains and higher calling, putting clergy mental health at risk. We surveyed all United Methodist clergy in North Carolina, and 95% (n = 1,726) responded, with 38% responding via phone interview. We compared clergy phone interview depression rates, assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), to those of in-person interviews in a representative United States sample that also used the PHQ-9. The clergy depression prevalence was 8.7%, significantly higher than the 5.5% rate of the national sample. We used logistic regression to explain depression, and also anxiety, assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. As hypothesized by effort-reward imbalance theory, several extrinsic demands (job stress, life unpredictability) and intrinsic demands (guilt about not doing enough work, doubting one's call to ministry) significantly predicted depression and anxiety, as did rewards such as ministry satisfaction and lack of financial stress. The high rate of clergy depression signals the need for preventive policies and programs for clergy. The extrinsic and intrinsic demands and rewards suggest specific actions to improve clergy mental health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 18%
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 12%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 29 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 26%
Social Sciences 15 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 29 28%