Title |
The perfect neuroimaging-genetics-computation storm: collision of petabytes of data, millions of hardware devices and thousands of software tools
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brain Imaging and Behavior, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11682-013-9248-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ivo D. Dinov, Petros Petrosyan, Zhizhong Liu, Paul Eggert, Alen Zamanyan, Federica Torri, Fabio Macciardi, Sam Hobel, Seok Woo Moon, Young Hee Sung, Zhiguo Jiang, Jennifer Labus, Florian Kurth, Cody Ashe-McNalley, Emeran Mayer, Paul M. Vespa, John D. Van Horn, Arthur W. Toga, for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative |
Abstract |
The volume, diversity and velocity of biomedical data are exponentially increasing providing petabytes of new neuroimaging and genetics data every year. At the same time, tens-of-thousands of computational algorithms are developed and reported in the literature along with thousands of software tools and services. Users demand intuitive, quick and platform-agnostic access to data, software tools, and infrastructure from millions of hardware devices. This explosion of information, scientific techniques, computational models, and technological advances leads to enormous challenges in data analysis, evidence-based biomedical inference and reproducibility of findings. The Pipeline workflow environment provides a crowd-based distributed solution for consistent management of these heterogeneous resources. The Pipeline allows multiple (local) clients and (remote) servers to connect, exchange protocols, control the execution, monitor the states of different tools or hardware, and share complete protocols as portable XML workflows. In this paper, we demonstrate several advanced computational neuroimaging and genetics case-studies, and end-to-end pipeline solutions. These are implemented as graphical workflow protocols in the context of analyzing imaging (sMRI, fMRI, DTI), phenotypic (demographic, clinical), and genetic (SNP) data. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 29% |
South Africa | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 116 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 19% |
Researcher | 20 | 17% |
Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
Professor | 6 | 5% |
Other | 20 | 17% |
Unknown | 20 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 16 | 14% |
Neuroscience | 13 | 11% |
Engineering | 12 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 9% |
Psychology | 11 | 9% |
Other | 24 | 20% |
Unknown | 31 | 26% |