↓ Skip to main content

Meta-analysis of the efficacy of alendronate for the prevention of hip fractures in postmenopausal women

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of alendronate for the prevention of hip fractures in postmenopausal women
Published in
Osteoporosis International, September 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00198-004-1725-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Socrates E. Papapoulos, Sara A. Quandt, Uri A. Liberman, Marc C. Hochberg, Desmond E. Thompson

Abstract

Treatment with alendronate, a potent and specific inhibitor of bone resorption, is known to significantly reduce fracture risk among women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the consistency of the effect of alendronate in reducing the risk of hip fracture among different studies and populations. Data from completed, randomized, treatment studies were pooled in a meta-analysis. The duration of the studies ranged from 1-4.5 years. The dose of alendronate ranged from 5-20 mg/day, with over 95% of patients receiving either 5 or 10 mg/day during the trials. In patients with a T-score of less than or equal to -2.0, or with a vertebral fracture, the effect on hip fracture risk consistently favored patients receiving alendronate therapy, with an overall reduction in risk of hip fracture of 45% [95% confidence interval (CI) 16% to 64%, P=0.007]. For patients who met the criteria of osteoporosis, as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), the overall risk reduction was 55% (95% CI 29% to 72%, P=0.0008). In both analyses we performed a sensitivity analysis by removing one study at a time. The strength of the evidence was not dependent on any one study. We conclude that therapy with alendronate is associated with significant and clinically important reductions in the incidence of hip fracture in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. The overall reduction is consistent among different patient populations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 3%
Spain 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 67 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 51%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Materials Science 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 19 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2016.
All research outputs
#3,769,322
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#624
of 3,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,280
of 60,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.