↓ Skip to main content

Mechanoprotection by skeletal muscle caveolae.

Overview of attention for article published in Bioarchitecture, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanoprotection by skeletal muscle caveolae.
Published in
Bioarchitecture, January 2016
DOI 10.1080/19490992.2015.1131891
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harriet P Lo, Thomas E Hall, Robert G Parton

Abstract

Caveolae, small bulb-like pits, are the most abundant surface feature of many vertebrate cell types. The relationship of the structure of caveolae to their function has been a subject of considerable scientific interest in view of the association of caveolar dysfunction with human disease. In a recent study Lo et al (1) investigated the organization and function of caveolae in skeletal muscle. Using quantitative 3D electron microscopy caveolae were shown to be predominantly organized into multilobed structures which provide a large reservoir of surface-connected membrane underlying the sarcolemma. These structures were preferentially disassembled in response to changes in membrane tension. Perturbation or loss of caveolae in mouse and zebrafish models suggested that caveolae can protect the muscle sarcolemma against damage in response to excessive membrane activity. Flattening of caveolae to release membrane into the bulk plasma membrane in response to increased membrane tension can allow cell shape changes and prevent membrane rupture. In addition, disassembly of caveolae can have widespread effects on lipid-based plasma membrane organization. These findings suggest that the ability of the caveolar membrane system to respond to mechanical forces is a crucial evolutionarily-conserved process which is compromised in disease conditions associated with mutations in key caveolar components.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,356,550
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Bioarchitecture
#12
of 74 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,157
of 402,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioarchitecture
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 74 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them