You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acute Heart Failure Alternatives to Hospitalization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Heart Failure, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.12.014 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Reka Zsilinszka, Robert J. Mentz, Adam D. DeVore, Zubin J. Eapen, Peter S. Pang, Adrian F. Hernandez |
| Abstract |
Acute heart failure (HF) is a major public health problem with substantial associated economic costs. Because most patients who present to hospitals are admitted irrespective of their level of risk, novel approaches to manage acute HF are needed, such as the use of same-day access clinics for outpatient diuresis and observation units from the emergency department. Current published data lacks a comprehensive overview of the present state of acute HF management in various clinical settings. This review summarizes the strengths and limitations of acute HF care in the outpatient and emergency department settings. Finally, a variety of innovative technologies that have the potential to improve acute HF management are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 23% |
| Spain | 5 | 8% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 7% |
| Mexico | 4 | 7% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 62% |
| Scientists | 12 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,193,393
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Heart Failure
#376
of 1,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,822
of 321,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Heart Failure
#12
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.