↓ Skip to main content

Copy Number Variations Found in Patients with a Corpus Callosum Abnormality and Intellectual Disability

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatrics, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Copy Number Variations Found in Patients with a Corpus Callosum Abnormality and Intellectual Disability
Published in
Journal of Pediatrics, March 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.02.023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Solveig Heide, Boris Keren, Thierry Billette de Villemeur, Sandra Chantot-Bastaraud, Christel Depienne, Caroline Nava, Cyril Mignot, Aurélia Jacquette, Eric Fonteneau, Elodie Lejeune, Corinne Mach, Isabelle Marey, Sandra Whalen, Didier Lacombe, Sophie Naudion, Caroline Rooryck, Annick Toutain, Cédric Le Caignec, Damien Haye, Laurence Olivier-Faivre, Alice Masurel-Paulet, Christel Thauvin-Robinet, Fabien Lesne, Anne Faudet, Dorothée Ville, Vincent des Portes, Damien Sanlaville, Jean-Pierre Siffroi, Marie-Laure Moutard, Delphine Héron

Abstract

To evaluate the role that chromosomal micro-rearrangements play in patients with both corpus callosum abnormality and intellectual disability, we analyzed copy number variations (CNVs) in patients with corpus callosum abnormality/intellectual disability STUDY DESIGN: We screened 149 patients with corpus callosum abnormality/intellectual disability using Illumina SNP arrays. In 20 patients (13%), we have identified at least 1 CNV that likely contributes to corpus callosum abnormality/intellectual disability phenotype. We confirmed that the most common rearrangement in corpus callosum abnormality/intellectual disability is inverted duplication with terminal deletion of the 8p chromosome (3.2%). In addition to the identification of known recurrent CNVs, such as deletions 6qter, 18q21 (including TCF4), 1q43q44, 17p13.3, 14q12, 3q13, 3p26, and 3q26 (including SOX2), our analysis allowed us to refine the 2 known critical regions associated with 8q21.1 deletion and 19p13.1 duplication relevant for corpus callosum abnormality; report a novel 10p12 deletion including ZEB1 recently implicated in corpus callosum abnormality with corneal dystrophy; and) report a novel pathogenic 7q36 duplication encompassing SHH. In addition, 66 variants of unknown significance were identified in 57 patients encompassed candidate genes. Our results confirm the relevance of using microarray analysis as first line test in patients with corpus callosum abnormality/intellectual disability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 19%
Other 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2022.
All research outputs
#5,288,711
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatrics
#3,199
of 12,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,959
of 321,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatrics
#53
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.