↓ Skip to main content

Arguments for and against extending the interval between colonoscopies following negative results in colorectal cancer screening

Overview of attention for article published in Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, December 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Arguments for and against extending the interval between colonoscopies following negative results in colorectal cancer screening
Published in
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, December 2024
DOI 10.1080/14737140.2024.2438074
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2024.
All research outputs
#18,946,779
of 27,453,412 outputs
Outputs from Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy
#766
of 1,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,931
of 160,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,453,412 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,212 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.