↓ Skip to main content

Different prey resources suggest little competition between non-native frogs and insectivorous birds despite isotopic niche overlap

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Different prey resources suggest little competition between non-native frogs and insectivorous birds despite isotopic niche overlap
Published in
Biological Invasions, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10530-016-1333-9
Authors

Robyn L. Smith, Karen H. Beard, Aaron B. Shiels

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Master 8 17%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 59%
Environmental Science 5 11%
Engineering 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,388,156
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#991
of 2,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,788
of 416,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#20
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.