| Title |
How well does diagnosis-based risk-adjustment work for comparing ambulatory clinical outcomes?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Care Management Science, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10729-009-9101-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Askar S. Chukmaitov, David W. Harless, Nir Menachemi, Charles Saunders, Robert G. Brooks |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 21% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 21% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 21% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,522,616
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Health Care Management Science
#86
of 285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,020
of 93,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Care Management Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them