| Title |
Changes in the microbial community of an anammox consortium during adaptation to marine conditions revealed by 454 pyrosequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00253-017-8160-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Blanca M. Gonzalez-Silva, Are J. Rønning, Ingrid K. Andreassen, Ingrid Bakke, Francisco J. Cervantes, Kjetill Østgaard, Olav Vadstein |
| Abstract |
The anammox activity of a freshwater anammox consortium was strongly inhibited at low-salinity level. Stepwise adaptation from 0 to 3 g NaCl L(-1) took 153 days. Further adaptation to high-salinity concentration (from 3 to 30 g L(-1)) took only 40 days, and no inhibition was observed. A comprehensive insight into the salinity-induced successions of the total and the anammox communities was obtained by 454 pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons and statistical analysis. A major succession in the anammox community was observed at 3 g L(-1) where the dominating population shifted from Candidatus Brocadia fulgida to Ca. Kuenenia stuttgartiensis. The latter dominated at high salinity and seemed to be essential for the high (˃96%) ammonium and nitrite removal efficiencies achieved. SIMPER analysis indicated that these two dominating anammox species explained most to the differences in community structure among samples and helped in identifying other important members at different salinities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 21 | 27% |
| Engineering | 12 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 29 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2018.
All research outputs
#19,611,252
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#6,478
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,382
of 311,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#71
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.