| Title |
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Can fresh embryo transfers be replaced by cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfers in assisted reproductive cycles? A randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10815-010-9412-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abbas Aflatoonian, Homa Oskouian, Shahnaz Ahmadi, Leila Oskouian |
| Abstract |
Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation has been shown to advance endometrial maturation and adversely affects implantation in ART. It has been reported that there is a better embryo-endometrium synchrony in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles than fresh embryo transfer cycles. The objective of this study was to compare ongoing pregnancy rates between fresh ET and FET cycles. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2013.
All research outputs
#3,545,582
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#166
of 1,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,820
of 97,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.