↓ Skip to main content

Expanding Lipidome Coverage Using LC-MS/MS Data-Dependent Acquisition with Automated Exclusion List Generation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
Expanding Lipidome Coverage Using LC-MS/MS Data-Dependent Acquisition with Automated Exclusion List Generation
Published in
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13361-017-1608-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy P. Koelmel, Nicholas M. Kroeger, Emily L. Gill, Candice Z. Ulmer, John A. Bowden, Rainey E. Patterson, Richard A. Yost, Timothy J. Garrett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 23%
Researcher 25 18%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 44 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 38 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 46 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#15,810,483
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#2,353
of 3,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,777
of 328,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#19
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,906 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.