↓ Skip to main content

Two low complexity ultra-high throughput methods to identify diverse chemically bioactive molecules using Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiological Research, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Two low complexity ultra-high throughput methods to identify diverse chemically bioactive molecules using Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Published in
Microbiological Research, February 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.micres.2017.02.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katarina Petrovic, Martin Pfeifer, Christian N. Parker, Sven Schuierer, John Tallarico, Dominic Hoepfner, N. Rao Movva, Gunther Scheel, Stephen B. Helliwell

Abstract

The budding yeast S. cerevisiae is widely used as a eukaryotic model organism to elucidate the mechanism of action of low molecular weight compounds. This report describes the development of two high throughput screening methods based on cell viability either by monitoring the reduction of alamarBlue(®) (resazurin) or by direct optical measurement of cell growth. Both methods can be miniaturized to allow screening of large numbers of samples, and can be performed using S. cerevisiae in 384 and 1536-well format. The alamarBlue(®) approach achieves Z' values of >0.7 with signal to basal ratios of >6.5, and around 1.1 million low molecular weight compounds were screened, identifying approximately 25,000 primary hits. Dose response curves generated for a subset (1930) using both alamarBlue(®) and optical density methods showed significant overlap. In genome-wide haploinsufficiency profiling (HIP), 572 of these hits demonstrated a diverse mechanism of action, affecting >25% of all yeast strains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 27%
Student > Bachelor 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Master 3 14%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 36%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,150,392
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Microbiological Research
#249
of 1,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,555
of 323,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiological Research
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,390 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.