↓ Skip to main content

Scale‐dependent relationships between tree species richness and ecosystem function in forests

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ecology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
264 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
628 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scale‐dependent relationships between tree species richness and ecosystem function in forests
Published in
Journal of Ecology, August 2013
DOI 10.1111/1365-2745.12132
Authors

Ryan A. Chisholm, Helene C. Muller‐Landau, Kassim Abdul Rahman, Daniel P. Bebber, Yue Bin, Stephanie A. Bohlman, Norman A. Bourg, Joshua Brinks, Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin, Nathalie Butt, Honglin Cao, Min Cao, Dairon Cárdenas, Li‐Wan Chang, Jyh‐Min Chiang, George Chuyong, Richard Condit, Handanakere S. Dattaraja, Stuart Davies, Alvaro Duque, Christine Fletcher, Nimal Gunatilleke, Savitri Gunatilleke, Zhanqing Hao, Rhett D. Harrison, Robert Howe, Chang‐Fu Hsieh, Stephen P. Hubbell, Akira Itoh, David Kenfack, Somboon Kiratiprayoon, Andrew J. Larson, Juyu Lian, Dunmei Lin, Haifeng Liu, James A. Lutz, Keping Ma, Yadvinder Malhi, Sean McMahon, William McShea, Madhava Meegaskumbura, Salim Mohd. Razman, Michael D. Morecroft, Christopher J. Nytch, Alexandre Oliveira, Geoffrey G. Parker, Sandeep Pulla, Ruwan Punchi‐Manage, Hugo Romero‐Saltos, Weiguo Sang, Jon Schurman, Sheng‐Hsin Su, Raman Sukumar, I‐Fang Sun, Hebbalalu S. Suresh, Sylvester Tan, Duncan Thomas, Sean Thomas, Jill Thompson, Renato Valencia, Amy Wolf, Sandra Yap, Wanhui Ye, Zuoqiang Yuan, Jess K. Zimmerman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 628 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
Brazil 5 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Other 14 2%
Unknown 589 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 129 21%
Researcher 114 18%
Student > Master 86 14%
Student > Bachelor 45 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 7%
Other 109 17%
Unknown 103 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 244 39%
Environmental Science 184 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 31 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 <1%
Engineering 6 <1%
Other 30 5%
Unknown 127 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,826,696
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ecology
#469
of 3,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,682
of 211,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ecology
#4
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.