↓ Skip to main content

Swinging at a Cocktail Party

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Science, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
13 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Swinging at a Cocktail Party
Published in
Psychological Science, August 2013
DOI 10.1177/0956797613482467
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingrid S. Johnsrude, Allison Mackey, Hélène Hakyemez, Elizabeth Alexander, Heather P. Trang, Robert P. Carlyon

Abstract

People often have to listen to someone speak in the presence of competing voices. Much is known about the acoustic cues used to overcome this challenge, but almost nothing is known about the utility of cues derived from experience with particular voices--cues that may be particularly important for older people and others with impaired hearing. Here, we use a version of the coordinate-response-measure procedure to show that people can exploit knowledge of a highly familiar voice (their spouse's) not only to track it better in the presence of an interfering stranger's voice, but also, crucially, to ignore it so as to comprehend a stranger's voice more effectively. Although performance declines with increasing age when the target voice is novel, there is no decline when the target voice belongs to the listener's spouse. This finding indicates that older listeners can exploit their familiarity with a speaker's voice to mitigate the effects of sensory and cognitive decline.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 195 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 21%
Student > Master 35 17%
Researcher 32 16%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Professor 13 6%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 37 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 78 38%
Neuroscience 20 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 7%
Linguistics 12 6%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 41 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 189. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2020.
All research outputs
#172,198
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science
#451
of 4,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,259
of 200,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science
#19
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 80.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.