↓ Skip to main content

How to Integrate Invisible Geomorphosites in an Inventory: a Case Study in the Rhone River Valley (Switzerland)

Overview of attention for article published in Geoheritage, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
How to Integrate Invisible Geomorphosites in an Inventory: a Case Study in the Rhone River Valley (Switzerland)
Published in
Geoheritage, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12371-017-0222-7
Authors

Mélanie Clivaz, Emmanuel Reynard

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 22 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 28%
Environmental Science 6 9%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Engineering 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 24 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,319,228
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Geoheritage
#72
of 439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,807
of 310,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoheritage
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 439 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.