↓ Skip to main content

Ambulatory Reflux Monitoring in GERD – Which Test Should be Performed and Should Therapy be Stopped?

Overview of attention for article published in Current Gastroenterology Reports, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Ambulatory Reflux Monitoring in GERD – Which Test Should be Performed and Should Therapy be Stopped?
Published in
Current Gastroenterology Reports, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11894-013-0316-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew J. Gawron, John E. Pandolfino

Abstract

Diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) often entails using a combination of patient symptoms, response to proton pump inhibitors (PPI), upper endoscopy, and ambulatory reflux testing. Each of these has limitations of which the clinician must be aware when managing patients with reflux symptoms. Ambulatory reflux monitoring, in particular, can potentially document the true presence of pathologic GERD. Consequently, reflux testing is often necessary in our evaluation of patients with reflux symptoms, and can be useful in distinguishing etiologies driving a lack of response to PPI therapy. Reflux testing results can be also used to guide appropriate PPI prescribing and clinical decision making for appropriate or unnecessary therapy. This review focuses on the limitations of our current diagnostic paradigm and highlights how reflux testing can be helpful in the diagnosis and management of patients with poor response to PPI therapy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Master 7 21%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 64%
Engineering 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 18%