| Title |
Daily Couple Experiences and Parent Affect in Families of Children with Versus Without Autism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-017-3088-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sigan L. Hartley, Leann Smith DaWalt, Haley M. Schultz |
| Abstract |
We examined daily couple experiences in 174 couples who had a child with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) relative to 179 couples who had a child without disabilities and their same-day association with parent affect. Parents completed a 14-day daily diary in which they reported time with partner, partner support, partner closeness, and positive and negative couple interactions and level of positive and negative affect. One-way multivariate analyses of covariance and dyadic multilevel models were conducted. Parents of children with ASD reported less time with partner, lower partner closeness, and fewer positive couple interactions than the comparison group. Daily couple experiences were more strongly associated with parent affect in the ASD than comparison group. Findings have implications for programs and supports. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 29% |
| Canada | 2 | 12% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Turkey | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 82% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 35 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 37 | 37% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 38 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 162. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2017.
All research outputs
#254,209
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#58
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,353
of 321,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.