You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neurocognitive phenomics: examining the genetic basis of cognitive abilities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychological Medicine, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s0033291712002656 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
G. Donohoe, I. J. Deary, D. C. Glahn, A. K. Malhotra, K. E. Burdick |
| Abstract |
Cognitive deficits are core to the disability associated with many psychiatric disorders. Both variation in cognition and psychiatric risk show substantial heritability, with overlapping genetic variants contributing to both. Unsurprisingly, therefore, these fields have been mutually beneficial : just as cognitive studies of psychiatric risk variants may identify genes involved in cognition, so too can genome-wide studies based on cognitive phenotypes lead to genes relevant to psychiatric aetiology. The purpose of this review is to consider the main issues involved in the phenotypic characterization of cognition, and to describe the challenges associated with the transition to genomewide approaches. We conclude by describing the approaches currently being taken by the international consortia involving many investigators in the field internationally (e.g. Cognitive Genomics Consortium; COGENT) to overcome these challenges. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 31% |
| Unknown | 5 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 42% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2013.
All research outputs
#14,175,799
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Medicine
#3,799
of 5,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,242
of 276,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Medicine
#38
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.