You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Isatuximab, Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone Induction Therapy for Transplant-Eligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Final Part 1 Analysis of the GMMG-HD7 Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Oncology, December 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1200/jco-24-02266 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elias K., Uta Bertsch, Ema Pozek, Roland Fenk, Britta Besemer, Christine Hanoun, Roland Schroers, Ivana von Metzler, Mathias Hänel, Christoph Mann, Lisa B. Leypoldt, Bernhard Heilmeier, Stefanie Huhn, Sabine K. Vogel, Michael Hundemer, Christof Scheid, Igor W. Blau, Steffen Luntz, Niels Weinhold, Diana Tichy, Tobias A.W. Holderried, Karolin Trautmann-Grill, Deniz Gezer, Maika Klaiber-Hakimi, Martin Müller, Evgenii Shumilov, Wolfgang Knauf, Christian S. Michel, Thomas Geer, Hendrik Riesenberg, Christoph Lutz, Marc S. Raab, Axel Benner, Martin Hoffmann, Katja C. Weisel, Hans J. Salwender, Hartmut Goldschmidt, for the German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group HD7 Investigators, German-speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group HD7, Miriam Ahlborn, Joachim Behringer, Helga Bernhard, Britta Besemer, Jörg Bittenbring, Igor Wolfgang Blau, Claus Bolling, Amelie Boquoi, Daniel Debatin, Gerlinde Egerer, Roland Fenk, Barbara Ferstl, Stefan Fronhoffs, Tobias Gaska, Thomas Geer, Deniz Gezer, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Martin Görner, Ullrich Graeven, Mathias Hänel, Bernhard Heilmeier, Michael Heinsch, Martin Hoffmann, Tobias A.W. Holderried, Olaf Hopfer, Snjezana Janjetovic, Maika Klaiber-Hakimi, Martine Klausmann, Stefan Klein, Wolfgang Knauf, Yon-Dschun Ko, Doris Maria Kraemer, Martin Kropff, Paul La Rosée, Rolf Mahlberg, Christoph Mann, Uwe Martens, Ivana von Metzler, Christian Michel, Martin Müller, Wolfram Pönisch, Peter Reimer, Claudia Riechel, Mark Ringhoffer, Mathias Rummel, Volker Runde, Hans Jürgen Salwender, Markus Schaich, Christoph Scheid, Martin Schmidt-Hieber, Daniel Schöndube, Roland Schroers, Hans-Joachim Schütte, Evgenii Shumilov, Peter Staib, Dirk Strumberg, Hans-Joachim Tischler, Karolin Trautmann-Grill, Walter Verbeek, Rudolf Weide, Eckhart Weidmann, Katja Weisel, Maike de Wit, Christiane Bernhardt, Thomas Fietz, Jochen Grassinger, Georg Köchling, Michael Neise, Stefan Schmitt, Heike Steiniger, Barbara Tschechne, Bettina Whitlock, Matthias Zaiß, Carsten Ziske |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 39% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Algeria | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Czechia | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 55% |
| Scientists | 11 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 39 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 27% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 42 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 154. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2026.
All research outputs
#333,569
of 34,306,620 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#611
of 32,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,041
of 403,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#5
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,306,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.